Sarah Seestone

Other examples provided by Camelia Naranch in Acquisitions: - a399917 [link ](https://folio.stanford.edu/inventory/view/6a4579ee-ccbd-5b4b-9c70-cf47443a0878?query=a399917&sort=title) | POL# 910103F06-1 | Virginia magazine of history and biography |SAL3 https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/399917 - a469834 [link](https://folio.stanford.edu/inventory/view/e8cb72b8-c22a-568b-8504-40e57cfc0b9e?query=a469834&sort=title) | POL# 941723F06-1...

Example of record that is part of multiple print collections: https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/5528103

It might complicate matters, but acknowledging that we have a display solution for digital collections that includes building the "Context" section the left bar under "At the Library" and we...

I'll do a check to see if we're missing links on any other SAL locations.

I'm doing a few checks to: 1. ensure we're ok to enable LCKSTK (and public services staff are prepared for that) 2. make sure we don't have more item types...

While it would be best to change the display and the data input at the same time, it would help public services staff tremendously if we can move the placement...

This issue was raised again in SW Feedback: https://jirasul.stanford.edu/jira/browse/SW-3886 Example record: https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/520112 And a very old example record, but also has a complication of information in angle brackets: https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/1786652

Line break example from 2021: Example record: https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/12688386 The 867 note "Library keeps latest only" applies to the Supplement, but the way the line breaks its hard to determine if...

I need to confirm with Gryphon search that they want to use "parts" in place of "digital items" as the descriptor for this new count.

Gryphon Search is good with "parts"