Šarūnas Burdulis

@LebedevRI Why can't this be merged?

Hello, maintainers and developers, please let me know what can be done to get this merged. Thank you.

I don't know what's impeding review and merge, but here is a darktable branch based on release 4.0.0: https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/issues/11258#issuecomment-1179588323

> Also, I have left the short maker name/ID as "OM", but that is up for debate: "OMDS", full "OM Digital Solutions"... even keep "Olympus"? Perhaps `

@LebedevRI @kmilos @TurboGit Is there anything I can help with to move this forward?

> What is required to close this out and get OM-1 support in darktable? Not sure why the hold-up with this, but if you would be willing to compile from...

> Thank you for this helpful suggestion. I am not familiar with cloning branches. I currently pull from: > > git pull --recurse-submodules https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable.git > > How would I change...

``` git clone https://github.com/sarunasb/darktable.git cd darktable git checkout om-1 git submodule update --init ``` After this, rawspeed should be in a branch with OM System support: ``` grep OM-1 src/external/rawspeed/data/cameras.xml...

Here is Apache reverse proxy configuration, which works for us. Using valid certificate on the host and ignoring the self-signed one in container. Container's port 443 is mapped to external...

@greymont Your screenshot is of darktable 4.0.1, not the “special” 4.0.om1 build. Standard, downloaded version of darktable does not support OM System yet. Thumbnails which are not skulls might be...