Sarab Singh
Sarab Singh
oh yes @MaxHorstmann. Still waiting on reply from @dims. I followed the currently implemented approach. However the PR you linked does suggest better approach Im open to work to implement...
@natasha41575 i guess this can be closed now. I see favicon is now added.
@penekk does the answer solves your query? can we close this issue?
Hey @shapirus, thanks for this great feature suggestion. We had internal discussion on this feature request and have come to conclusion that we will keep this issue open and will...
hey @avo-sepp thanks for feature suggestion, Have you tried [transformerconfigs](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/tree/master/examples/transformerconfigs). I believe you can accomplish this by passing only the `fieldspec` that you want to be changed. cc @koba1t
This looks good! The nil handling for `Options` is well implemented, excellent work. However, I'd suggest alternative of ensuring the `Options` struct always exists instead of allowing nil pointers. Unlike...
> @sarab97 would you agree to go back to the original implementation with a pointer so we can keep the serialization behaviour of kustomize? If its fine by you yeah...