Sam Coveney
Sam Coveney
Note that some of these "code format" failures are due to a previous commit that I had to rebase on...
*sigh* - I suppose I will rebase, _again_ You know, it gets really difficult to add new features, when relatively trivial changes are made to the code base that require...
Any thoughts @skoudoro @arokem ?
I've turned off the test in #3170 since I've already verified the gradient. Can change later if required. One issue is that the location (in parameter space) at which the...
I have tested different epsilon - I am now quite sure that the problem is testing using first-order finite difference approximation at the minimum, where it is not a good...
@tanishka321 any progress?
Hi @tanishka321 thanks for the work. I think you may have misunderstood #3155 though - the original test with _non-perturbed_ D works with autograd already, meaning my suggestion in #3155...
any progress on this @tanishka321 ?
It is very slow. Please let me know if I can help here.
Can we Cythonize it? I would need to look at some timings, but I have to wonder that the loops and array creation for the SVD is a big slow-down....