Sahid Velji
Sahid Velji
Would it make sense to focus on experimental -> hardening in this PR and work on hardening -> stable in a separate PR? As noted already, the implications of moving...
Related: I opened https://github.com/open-feature/go-sdk/issues/389, which proposes a breaking change to the initialization and shutdown functions (sections 2.4 and 2.5 of the spec) of the go-sdk.
So after looking into this more closely, I don't think we should be returning `map[string]string`. Users would use the [feature_flag consts defined in the semconv package](https://pkg.go.dev/go.opentelemetry.io/[email protected]/semconv/v1.34.0#section-readme:~:text=Namespace%3A%20feature_flag) to key into the...
Please see #418
> to make sure I understand how users will get the a specific value they will do like this correct? Yes that's right.
I'm in favour of adding a telemetry package in contrib and just deprecating the telemetry package in this repo. > I'd recommend we just cut the v1 maintenance branch now...
@beeme1mr @toddbaert Just following up here. Are we OK with deprecating the telemetry package here and creating it in contrib? I think that makes more sense given that the OTel...
> @beeme1mr @toddbaert Just following up here. Are we OK with deprecating the telemetry package here and creating it in contrib? I think that makes more sense given that the...
Whatever we decide here, we should be consistent across all the `sdk` repos. @beeme1mr Let me know if there is a better place to discuss proposals that affect all SDKs.
Any updates here? @beeme1mr @lukas-reining