rxgrant

If possible, please test this with pull #186.

> > I think BIP-322 on its own adds value, even if it is not addressing every single corner case in the galaxy right now. > > I'm not sure...

> > I think BIP-322 on its own adds value, even if it is not addressing every single corner case in the galaxy right now. > > I'm not sure...

I'm also pitching #438.

Strong objection to resolving this outside the chartering process. To delay the issue is to ignore the formal objections. If decisions are to move forward, look for consensus. One easy...

Also, this was publicly formally objected to. Not sure why we have to restate what has been clearly stated. What is the process here?

@iherman I have a process question [here](https://github.com/w3c/charter-drafts/issues/434#issuecomment-1715535627). What is the process requirement to restate what has already been formally objected to?

This does not have support from Digital Contract Design at our current level of understanding. However, we would be happy to engage in ...WG meetings to understand it better. One...

A charitable restatement of the 2021 formal objection about interoperability is that in many protocols, after you read one specification you know what to do. But in this decentralized family...

The following chart would help visualize these issues. It would be reasonable to add fields like these to the DID Method registry, or provide a way to focus on which...