Rubén Pérez Alonso

I think they're nonsense (the suggested changes sure are) since I tested it and it was reactive. But I'll test it out a bit more thoroughly when I can.

The reactivity bug Copilot mentions doesn't actually exist because the model is recomputed whenever a visibility flag changes. But if the model is mutated in place rather than reassigned then...

> I think the discussion above is about what happens when 'visible' on an item changes with respect `anyActionAvailable`. I still don't see how the Additional Actions buttons will show/hide...

> Not sure what to do with this since it doesn't work? What do you mean? I think it works. Edit: By non-functional I mean that it doesn't intend to...

You mean the whole invalid strings stuff or using two dashes? I did think it looked weird as well which is why I initially used a single dash for the...

I'd find that fairly inconsistent. Maybe we should use number dashes ("–")? In the QGC font they are clearly different from dashes and the minus sign, but they're still not...

Just tried it out and I think it's perfect. Doesn't look like a minus sign when it's on its own whatsoever: I left a couple normal dashes in the seconds...

By the way, I've also tried using em dashes for the non-numeric types as well as the integer part of numeric types (basically the places where we are currently using...

> I don't think this looks better. I like the existing look better. That's fair. You mean the em dashes, or using number dashes in general? That last screenshot is...

> I can merge once conflicts are fixed and you've figure out what's going on with the missing vertical/ground speed thing. I've rebased this, but I can't replicate the vertical/ground...