Russ Cox

This proposal has been added to the [active column](https://go.dev/s/proposal-status#active) of the proposals project and will now be reviewed at the weekly proposal review meetings. — rsc for the proposal review...

This boils down to whether we want to guarantee that every expression of the form 'interface { ... }' can have its embedded interfaces "compiled out" so that the interface...

Given how very few uses we think there are (approximately zero), a compiler flag to opt-out sounds fine. If we thought a significant number of users were affected, we'd want...

Based on the discussion above, this proposal seems like a **[likely accept](https://go.dev/s/proposal-status#likely-accept)**. — rsc for the proposal review group

This proposal has been added to the [active column](https://go.dev/s/proposal-status#active) of the proposals project and will now be reviewed at the weekly proposal review meetings. — rsc for the proposal review...

This proposal has been added to the [active column](https://go.dev/s/proposal-status#active) of the proposals project and will now be reviewed at the weekly proposal review meetings. — rsc for the proposal review...

Does anyone object to adding this API?

@neild, it sounds like there are two possible APIs here. Which one do you suggest? And does anyone else have any opinions on which one we use?

Does anyone object to the API in https://github.com/golang/go/issues/54136#issuecomment-1259894379 ?

Based on the discussion above, this proposal seems like a **[likely accept](https://go.dev/s/proposal-status#likely-accept)**. — rsc for the proposal review group