Russ Cox

Talked to @FiloSottile about this, and he believes we should move ECDH to the PrivateKey type, and then an interface can be defined (not necessarily in this package) that PrivateKey...

To elaborate on my comment from last week, the idea is to take ecdh.PrivateKey, which already has Bytes, Curve, Equal, Public, and PublicKey methods, and move the ECDH method over...

This proposal has been added to the [active column](https://go.dev/s/proposal-status#active) of the proposals project and will now be reviewed at the weekly proposal review meetings. — rsc for the proposal review...

This seems like a duplicate of #30058, #37724, and others. Is there a difference I am missing?

This proposal has been added to the [active column](https://go.dev/s/proposal-status#active) of the proposals project and will now be reviewed at the weekly proposal review meetings. — rsc for the proposal review...

Based on the discussion above, this proposal seems like a **[likely decline](https://go.dev/s/proposal-status#likely-decline)**. — rsc for the proposal review group

This proposal has been **[declined as retracted](https://go.dev/s/proposal-status#declined-as-retracted)**. — rsc for the proposal review group

This proposal has been added to the [active column](https://go.dev/s/proposal-status#active) of the proposals project and will now be reviewed at the weekly proposal review meetings. — rsc for the proposal review...

Based on the discussion above, this proposal seems like a **[likely accept](https://go.dev/s/proposal-status#likely-accept)**. — rsc for the proposal review group

No change in consensus, so **[accepted](https://go.dev/s/proposal-status#accepted)**. 🎉 This issue now tracks the work of implementing the proposal. — rsc for the proposal review group