Adding aruco_ros2 to index for distro

[david-wb]

Note: It's my first time trying to release a ros2 package. Apologies in advance for any mistakes on my part. I am following these instructions.

Please Add This Package to be indexed in the rosdistro.

humble jazzy rolling

The source is here:

https://github.com/namo-robotics/aruco_ros2

Checks

• [x] All packages have a declared license in the package.xml
• [x] This repository has a LICENSE file
• [x] This package is expected to build on the submitted rosdistro

[mjcarroll]

Holding for Rolling sync

[marcoag]

@david-wb can you point out differences (if any) between aruco_ros, aruco_opencv and the one proposed here?

[david-wb]

@marcoag aruco_ros is out-of-date and unmaintained, and was not working with the gazebo camera sensor, so I created this new version which has the following properties:

• Clear and simple API with full examples in the README
• Supports selecting the arcuco dictionary to use
• Works with gazebo camera sensor

I'm not familiar with aruco_opencv but it seems to have similar limitations as aruco_ros, at least for my use case.

[sloretz]

Holding for Rolling sync

[github-actions[bot]]

This PR hasn't been activity in 14 days. If you are still are interested in getting it merged please provide an update. Otherwise it will likely be closed by a rosdistro maintainer following our contributing policy. It's been labeled "stale" for visibility to the maintainers. If this label isn't appropriate, you can ask a maintainer to remove the label and add the 'persistent' label.

[christophebedard]

New package checklist:

• [x] At least one of the following must be present
  • [x] Top level license file: https://github.com/namo-robotics/aruco_markers/blob/humble/LICENSE
  • [x] Per package license files:
• [x] License is OSI-approved: MIT
• [x] License correctly listed in package.xmls
• [x] Public source repo: https://github.com/namo-robotics/aruco_markers
• [x] Source repository contains ROS packages
• [x] Each package meets REP-144 naming conventions

@marcoag are you satisfied with the explanation above? https://github.com/ros/rosdistro/pull/44321#issuecomment-2671300411

[david-wb]

@christophebedard I haved renamed the project from aruco_ros2 to aruco_markers. Does this help complete the new package checklist above?

[christophebedard]

Yeah, I think that's fine.

Could you re-order your entries alphabetically? See the failing CI job.