ronso0

Results 1331 comments of ronso0

The report now looks like this ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a414c09c-3270-40cb-abf0-e1d539243c4e) We _could_ calculate **new** missing tracks but I don't think that's worth it.

> It would make sense to print the scan results into the log output at startup, if Mixxx is started in developer mode. The report is always logged, just the...

> I think we have a scanning dialog that pops up when the scan takes longer. There is a risk that mixxx is locked when using the library during scanning....

> How about showing the dialog only if new tracks are found or some are missing in the startup case? Yes, that wold make sense. new tracks, new missing tracks,...

> For my use case it would be also nice to put new tracks in an "Incoming" crate. The "New tracks" feature / crate would make sense. How / when...

I think the report can be optimized. IMO this is sufficient: > Scan took 1181 ms. > >1 new tracks found 0 moved tracks detected 1 tracks are missing 0...

The report dialog now only displays relevant information: new / moved / new missing / rediscovered tracks only if there are any. I'll work on a fixup to show the...

> I'll work on a fixup to show the report dialog during startup only if changes have been detected. done.

This is ready for review again.

Thanks for taking a look! Pre-commit should be happy now. I removed the TODOs you mentioned.