Rob Shakir

Today, we don't explicitly support `ordered-by user` (i.e., inserted order) lists in ygot. The original design here was aiming to optimise `list` types to be as user-friendly as possible, which...

Re-opening for a discussion. I wonder whether we should implement this in a bit more general manner going forward -- perhaps similarly to how `cmp` handles this. For example, we...

Good point about generating the empty files -- it's a bit messy from the perspective of non-bazel users to have a bunch of files sitting around, should we consider having...

That sounds great to me :-) Do we know all of the callers of `generator.go` that are doing path struct generation today? I'm not sure that we do - so...

SGTM -- it's pretty trivial to implement both.

Hi, This isn't something that is actively being worked on. It is of course possible to develop a similar library for C++. C++ implementations that use ygot are using the...

Today, ygot doesn't have support for validating whether a `mandatory` field is populated. This is something that could be added, and we'd be happy to help with a design/pull request...

@wenovus is spot on here. There are a few points: 1. Path compressed structs are suitable as an internal to an implementation format rather than an interchange format. All marshalling...

hi folks! Yes, today we don't support `bits` or `instance-identifier` types (supported types are in [this table](https://github.com/openconfig/ygot/blob/master/docs/design.md#mapping-of-yang-types-to-go-types)). There's no real reason that they can't be supported -- just we didn't...

It does not. No ygot tool currently supports the YANG Notification or RPC statement. r. On Fri, 12 Jun 2020 at 18:52, saintnoah wrote: > @wenovus sorry can I ask...