Rob Ede
Rob Ede
Some amount of no_std support could be incrementally added using this reserved crate. See #551.
I've removed the link to #507 since it doesn't fully address it. But it does address the builder side of the problem afaict.
Alternative design: `Builder::from_parts()` / (`impl From for Builder`) construction becomes `Builder::from_parts(uri.to_parts())` / (`Builder::from(uri.to_parts())`). Pros: - equally comprehensible - mirrors `Uri::from_parts` method - (permits `parts.into()` where Builder is passed to fn)...
related to #229
Hitting a similar issue to @k0nserv at work with the aws-sdk crates which require zeroize ^1.4. It's very common in the Cargo ecosystem for MSRV bumps to exist in minor...
> cargo itself does not recommend the use of mutually exclusive features Yeah... it's a tricky one. > If you are okay with splitting it into multiple commands This is...
Hey, @actix lead here. The runtime strategy used in Actix Web fits this description. From the [actix-rt](https://docs.rs/actix-rt) docs: > In most parts of the the Actix ecosystem, it has been...
Adding support sooner than v1.0 would be great. Need to decide how the bank independent system will work first and restructure/clean up some of the back end.
Want it to be ready when the public Monzo API is released so looking at around mid July.
Okay so whenever the current accounts are mainstream then.