Robert Mosolgo

What queries would it be able to serve? At least in GraphQL-Ruby, the only ones I can think of are introspection-related -- anything accessing `foo { ... }` would fail...

> private and public schema No, it wouldn't warn in that case. I'm considering adding a warning when the _whole_ schema has _no_ implementations for an interface (including hidden ones),...

Thanks for the link. I think it's _possible_, but I doubt I'll have the bandwidth for it soon. So I'll share my thoughts in case you want to give it...

I recently merged #2844 which will make this possible in general, then I [asked about Ably's batch support](https://github.com/ably/ably-ruby-rest/issues/9) and got directed to the [`#request` method](https://github.com/ably/ably-ruby/blob/1a27617c30cb9b66f51e0d4b1e60a5eacc999d8b/lib/ably/rest/client.rb#L324-L338), I hope to take a...

Hi, I've been toying with a language server for a couple of days and I wanted a similar configuration. I have something that works-ish, so I'll share it in case...

Thanks @floriandejonckheere, I was able to get going again by updating my gemfile to point at your branch: ```ruby gem "squid", "~> 1.4", github: "floriandejonckheere/squid", ref: "0e67fbebe2012c82a64f9716c18cfe8025173630" ```

`metadata` is part of the legacy type definition system, you're right that there's no way to access it apart from `.graphql_definition`. Instead of `.metadata`, you should store custom values in...

> future proof way of providing a masking feature? Yes, `def self.visible?(ctx)` is the way. Here are some docs on that: https://graphql-ruby.org/authorization/visibility.html Besides swapping implementations at runtime, you can also...

Yeah, there's not a way to install a field class for every base type in _one_ line of code -- the base Object, Interface, and Mutation classes all need that...

:+1: I like the idea, I've had half a mind to implement it in Ruby anyways, since the IDL isn't showing signs of ever leaving RFC stage 😆 Thanks for...