Robert M Flight

Hmm, maybe something got fixed in those 5 builds. I'll try it again and see what happens.

How about .R and .r for the R language??

@anvaka That actually looks like it is capturing the relevant semantics of the language! Thank you!

I truly just picked one. I'll be honest, I'm just a user, I haven't followed the literature in this space, I think I just picked the first one in the...

Sorry, yes, it doesn't crash, but generates an error. Functions should work with default arguments. Hence the pull request.

Well, that is good to hear. I don't see https://github.com/hadley/testthat/pull/594 or https://github.com/hadley/testthat/pull/597 having been merged though, so I can't vouch for testthat. I do know that an issue was that...

Sorry all for the lack of response. I've been super busy with other stuff, and although this was a really great idea at the time, I haven't found much personal...

I'm glad you think it is a good idea @jimhester. I'm likely to work on a full pull request for this type of thing if it doesn't get picked up...

That's a neat idea @jimhester , although you would probably have to extend to the contents of the function.Rd as that is often where the bits of information that set...

Right, function names and implementations may be completely different, but describing purpose and/or methods should illuminate true diss/similarity