Rafal Krupski

@y2uk License has been updated accordingly. That should address your concerns.

It looks like an issue with default sorting of release on GitHub as the latest one displayed is Opera 85 indeed, but as you can see [on page 3](https://github.com/operasoftware/operachromiumdriver/releases?page=3) webdrivers...

@krb-vci, that's true, in Selenium bindings _OperaOptions_ is still using old naming which is invalid to the W3C. However, there is a workaround - please have a look at my...

@krb-vci `w3c` option is incorrectly used in your snippet above. It's not a cmd line switch for Opera binary (this is what `AddArgument`/`add_argument` method really does), but an additional option...

Hi Guys! Sorry for delayed answer. I have also experienced this issue. A quick workaround should be to use _ChromeOptions()_ and additional argument for the browser: "_allow-elevated-browser_": `from selenium import...

@vania-pooh We're going to release a new OperaDriver soon, but first we want to fix the problem with "No matching capabilities found" to eliminate a need to use any workarounds.

Hi @chprsk , If you're on Windows and your Opera is not installed either in _"Program Files\Opera"_ or _"Program Files (x86)\Opera"_ then you have to use _ChromeOptions()_ and pass a...

Hi, the problem should be fixed in the latest [release](https://github.com/operasoftware/operachromiumdriver/releases/tag/v.91.0.4472.77) for Opera 77.

Hi, using Selenium 4.0.0 with the latest operadriver v.96.0.4664.45 (Opera 82) try to apply additional option `wc3=True` when instantiating the driver. Here is a snippet for Python: `options = webdriver.ChromeOptions()`...