Rich FitzJohn
Rich FitzJohn
I believe that the disk I/O is the bottleneck for most of these and I'd be shocked if process level parallelism could speed that up
BatchJobs development has been moved to [batchtools](https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/batchtools/index.html) I believe. I have some reservations about this: * using batchtools as the default would add both (presumably) some overhead and IMO an...
The globals package could be possibly used internally for some of the code scouring (as mooted in #64, #121)
Just to let you know - this is absoutely on my radar, but this week has been busy. I will look at this asap
Yes, that would be great, thanks. I am currently fairly ignorant of where the state-of-the-art is in this area, and would appreciate the help
:+1: - totally agree
I'm afraid I don't understand the issue well, or what the ~~snail :snail:~~ slug bits actually mean. *But* from looking quickly at the httrmock code, it's possible that the namespace...
Hmm. Part of my personal use-case that inspired storr was to get de-duplicated storage and avoid hitting an external source by separating the key value mapping into a key hash...
It might be easiest to use one opaque object, perhaps? Something like the DBI/SQLite storage that the development version of storr has (check out the `develop` branch, use `storr::storr_dbi()` with...
Thinking about this some more; if the major issue is getting things stored nicely in git, then it would be possible to use git itself as the object store (see...