Robert Bragg
Robert Bragg
Surely the jni / jni-sys crates are only internal deps for the ndk crate so you should be ok to bump later? I intentionally don't expose any jni types for...
> > Surely the jni / jni-sys crates are only internal deps for the ndk crate > > This PR is marked as _breaking_ for a reason 😉 where do...
> We seem to be on a ± yearly breaking release schedule It could be nice if we could do more frequent releases and maybe not worry too much whether...
> > where do the ndk / ndk-sys crates currently expose jni/jni-sys types? that doesn't sound good to me and maybe we can try to remove any exposure? > >...
> One solution I can think of is letting Window have an API for launching a new activity? So maybe the first Window created would be the main one, and...
> EDIT by @madsmtm: CC #3505 btw @madsmtm I guess you were trying to link some other issue here? this is pointing back to this PR?
> > we could try and keep options open for multiple activities that could run in the same process but there would still likely be some thorny details try do...
There certainly are some changes in the pipeline that are likely to affect this but, so long as we feel like this isn't immutable then maybe it's ok to land...
I'd also like to reiterate the thanks for looking at this @jmaargh, having some visual docs for this seems like it would be really nice to have, sorry for dropping...
@jwiesler I think at the moment the original repos from @meh are receiving some changes so it could be good to check those out more closely. I would also recommend...