Richard Hulme

> @rhulme can you point to any documentation on this? I can't find anything specific about this. The only thing I can find is this on the `ioctl` man page:...

Just pinging this as the PR is still marked as "awaiting feedback" but I provided feedback in June 2021.

Thank you for the quick response. Just to be sure I've understood - transferring one word (8/16/32 bits depending on configuration) will take four cycles (one for each of the...

I've tested the changes with an STM8S103F3P6 board. Without them I couldn't get it to work at all. This chip has a 64-byte page size, not 128 as the code...

> Thanks! Because of #2596, you might be able to remove `tags = ["manual"]` from this too I haven't got my head around how exactly Bazel does things yet. I...

> > I noticed `host/hardware_irq` still has issues because `PICO_NUM_VTABLE_IRQS` is not defined. > > More PRs are always welcome! 😄 I was trying to decide what the "right" way...

I'm happy to create a PR to either add the dependency explicitly to host/hardware_irq, or to remove the explicit exclusion in the base CMakeLists.txt (in `pico_simple_hardware_impl_target` and `pico_simple_hardware_headers_target`) depending on...

Are there any clear ideas regarding overall goals and intended changes for host mode? It would be nice to get it to a state where it could be used for...