Peter Stenger

Closing as something extremely low priority that won't be merged soon.

As discussed on Slack 11/21, @mwest1066 is fine with adding this even though there is a package size increase. In the future, we should consider splitting up the container (see...

Marking this as draft to avoid coderabbit comments.

> ## All images > Image Platform Old Size New Size Change > [prairielearn/prairielearn:2636deb80ff4590cab4103690c1edabd981be7dd](https://hub.docker.com/layers/prairielearn/prairielearn/2636deb80ff4590cab4103690c1edabd981be7dd/images/sha256-6e7280fb22707bd7b5a2b371f85d0f0eff502ecf1d9b24a7f105ff45df8ea710?context=explore) linux/arm64 1.75% I suspect this is from the `texlive-latex-extra` package.

Discussed with @mwest1066 -- we definitely want logging of the regeneration event, but we shouldn't be concerned with display yet. We also should include the enrollment code as context in...

Ah -- my apologies! I had assumed that it would parse the operators beyond ``` "A_Expr": { "kind": "AEXPR_OP", "name": [ { "String": { "sval": "" } } ], ```...

The explicit feature ask would then be the tree at `Plan` time, i.e. the [`PlannedStmt` node representation](https://github.com/postgres/postgres/blob/89372d0aaa4a6f0e560acdf9014c5ad66fdde1b1/src/include/nodes/plannodes.h#L46).

It looks like this regressed in https://github.com/PrairieLearn/PrairieLearn/pull/10698 back in September 2024 -- previously, it only validated that the new QID matched that regex when you did the "change ID" action....

Some parts of this have started: #13332 #13333 #13346

@coderabbit pause @coderabbitai pause