refi64
refi64
@drewwells Not that I know of, though that would be a nice feature.
www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2yzgd0/qo_a_cc_build_system_with_no_build_files/ I'm referring to the latter.
Related question: is there a reason winepak's runtime isn't an extension? E.g. for applications that *require* Wine but don't necessarily *only* use Wine and need deps on another runtime.
To add on to this: This seems to be a conflict with the way the Compat.i386 extension is extracted and how it's mounted. When the i386 runtime is built, all...
Any update on this? It just bit me about 10 seconds ago.
@lazka Would you take PRs?
Wouldn't a workaround be to just `os.mkdir` the directory if it doesn't already exist?
I mean I was referring to the apt module calling mkdir itself... On Fri, Oct 25, 2019, 2:55 AM Feng Yu wrote: > Yes, os.mkdir is a quick and dirty...
> Ah, I thought you may remember me. Something about this is just so sad...
What about just doing a pre-commit hook that makes sure the bootstrap is up to date?