ramin

@vgonkivs migrated remaining tasks from https://github.com/celestiaorg/celestia-node/issues/1835 here and closing

@renaynay raised a good point i agree with that choosing a more generic name for this module and API, something other than "blobstream", might be better. As although it is...

@rach-id so there is a general desire to follow @liamsi 's comment about decomposing this, such that instead of "blobstream" being a whole module, the new API functionality lives in...

@distractedm1nd can we remove this comment now? Should we consider removing transients altogether? Lets quickly do either

@Halimao this is cool, i think the original ticket requests to NOT output to stdout at all, vs an alternate screen, with that it may be we do not merge...

Adding some relevent context, we have a single "middleware" for auth, viewable here https://github.com/celestiaorg/celestia-node/blob/7ea607bef1c82c63d3e75e29baecfe56cb46a705/api/rpc/server.go#L45 if we WERE to implement this, it'd be an opportunity to apply some common go http...