Rahul Gaur

Upon comparing the geometry coefficients from Simsopt with the ones from the gyrokinetics code GX, I get the following results where every geometric quantity except cvdrift and gbdrift matches well....

Thanks for doing that check, Gareth! A few weeks ago, Matt suspected that there is another coefficient with a sign issue in vmec_fieldlines. To understand this better for a simpler...

## Ideal-ballooning marginal stability test The marginal stability contour against ideal-ballooning modes has been plotted by many physicists before us. Therefore, I'll use that to clear some of the confusion...

Currently, the boundary coefficients from the efit_to_desc function and the ones from SangKyeun's file do not match because his coefficients are not from the last surface. @f0uriest I think it...

I am now trying to optimize a curve along with an equilibrium. On each point on an equilibrium surface closest to this curve, I try to impose a sharp curvature....

FAILED tests/test_plotting.py::TestPlotBoundary::test_plot_boundary_surface - pluggy.PluggyTeardownRaisedWarning: A plugin raised an exception during an old-style hookwrapper teardown. But the test works on my local system. Mention this during the group meeting.

No, I did not use the mpl flag. I just ran` pytest -k test_plot_boundary_surface` Without mpl, is it not comparing the figures at all?

>I think the objective you added makes sense, it tries to align the alpha=0 field line with the umbilic curve. Something I am not sure of is, do your curves...

The equations for the elliptic integrals K and E are obtained in the limit of a large-aspect ratio, low-beta tokamak. Therefore, if we create a large-aspect ratio tokamak, our bounce...

> The equations for the elliptic integrals K and E are obtained in the limit of a large-aspect ratio, low-beta tokamak. Therefore, if we create a large-aspect ratio tokamak, our...