pancake
this issue is almost finished, could you guys test and check the pending things? thx
can you re-verify?
no. you have fuckedup the stack, so there’s no way to recover the backtrace > On 20 Nov 2015, at 10:31, nvm [email protected] wrote: > > $ r2 -d a.out...
yeah, this seems like a bug, can you try with other backtrace engines? ``` [0x00000000]> e dbg.btalgo =? default fuzzy anal ``` > On 20 Nov 2015, at 10:59, nvm...
opening a file implies changing the bits acording to the info provided by rbin. in this case. the bin shuoldnt report any specific bitsize because its an unknown filetype, so...
confirmed. i can reproduce this issue > On 14 Jan 2016, at 21:02, akrasuski1 [email protected] wrote: > > Check out this log: > > [0x7f0c3b34fcd0]> =h > Starting http server......
e anal.eobjmp=true > On 08 Mar 2016, at 03:30, Ido Yariv [email protected] wrote: > > It appears function boundaries are a bit off when tail call optimization is used. For...
eobjmp doesnt exactly means that the funciton terminates on any jump. it must have some kind of conditions.. i know that this creates problems, because it is not easy to...
All yours if you are in the mood :D > On 09 Mar 2016, at 11:04, Riccardo Schirone [email protected] wrote: > > Yes, a lot. This is /bin/cat for example:...
Which condition can we assume when considering a tail continuation or not? Do you have more examples?