pancake
i would prefer to be arch-independent, if a human can understand the disasm, a parser should too.. On 11 Mar 2014, at 08:27, Fedor Sakharov [email protected] wrote: > look at...
ping @montekki can you send a pr for that? checking for arch can be a dirty but working solution, so having this done with a couple of tests would be...
also we can differentiate if the number starts with # instead of just 0x and if it contains :
from me? > On 19 Feb 2017, at 19:49, Maijin wrote: > > Can we have test-case or something to reproduce this 0xXXX:16 syntax ? > >
nope, this is not done yet.
👍 > On 13 Mar 2016, at 22:21, Aneesh Dogra [email protected] wrote: > > I am interested in working on this. > > — > Reply to this email directly...
Yep some commands are constructed by multiple calls of commands. This requires a console buffer push or a rewrite of the specific function to use the api instead of commands...
Would be good to have a reproducer that make it happen 100% of the times. > On 10 Jan 2016, at 20:38, akrasuski1 [email protected] wrote: > > Normally, when we...
Can we move this for 1.0, i dont think this is blocking for 0.10 release. it is "only" needed for radeco, which there's no release planed yet.