Tako Schotanus
Tako Schotanus
But the whole issue with these solutions is that it doesn't bring anything new to the table, you could _literally_ do this right now without making any changes: ```json "tulip-cli":...
So all in all, given my previous message, I'm not sure it's worth do any of this at all. It brings very few advantages to create a versioning that probably...
Nice work @wfouche , I think it's certainly something we can consider adding to the main catalog
> should consider `jbang myapp:0.0.3@#` to verify artifacts. Opened https://github.com/jbangdev/jbang/issues/1989
It's difficult, I'm not sure how many examples we have "in the wild" of aliases referring to other aliases. And then they'd both need to have arguments (or other options)...
We're always happy to accept contributions :-) But in this case we actually rely on an external project to do our packing for us: https://jreleaser.org/guide/latest/reference/packagers/index.html So it might be more...
I understand your use-case, but I don't think it's "normal" for applications to just allow multiple versions to be around and make them easily switchable. If what you want is...
> Does this explanation help, and make sense? It does, I just think that your use-case is exactly what `JBANG_DOWNLOAD_VERSION ` is meant for. Ideally, like with any regular application,...
> Should be independent of the catalog feature I would say. You're right
Personally I'm not very worried about the type of document, the options you mention are all valid. It's more about the _how_. In JBang we can't have, or at least...