qlrd

> I've been thinking, for the sake of simplicity and standardization, we could remove the try/except with `random`, just use `urandom`, and remove the specific test too. This align with...

> I've been thinking, for the sake of simplicity and standardization, we could remove the try/except with `random`, just use `urandom`, and remove the specific test too. This align with...

> > fixed > > Did you test the simulator? I believe a mock for `urandom` which loads `random` will be needed Yes, made in simulator before #588

I thougt in this for a time, like a "airgapped payjoin" without a coordinator (mixing inputs between two parts). But the protocol states that is necessary a coordinator. Besides that,...