Piotr Smaron
Piotr Smaron
> I've left some suggestions. @annastuchlik thanks, I've resolved them.
`cling-tidy` failure is unrelated to this PR, as in https://github.com/scylladb/scylladb/pull/18842#issuecomment-2209266931
@nyh can you please review?
2024.2 backport: https://github.com/scylladb/scylla-enterprise/pull/4985
@mykaul changed from P3 to P2. Yes, we're making progress, @KrzaQ is about to close 1 bug, which will in turn close 3 issues.
@michoecho is this the change you had in mind in https://github.com/scylladb/scylladb/issues/12640? EDIT: `./test.py boost/transport_test` passes, but probably needs to be extended to cover the scenario handled in this PR.
@scylladb/scylla-maint can you please review
> @scylladb/scylla-maint can you please review @scylladb/scylla-maint can you please merge the PR
The format of the envelope is usually: > ... description... > > Fixes: https://github.com/scylladb/scylladb/issues/17237
> > BTW, how useful is the QUERY audit if most users are using prepared statements all the time ? doesn't it make sense we'll log the parameters as well...