Pino Toscano

@martinpitt I hope I'm not pushing to nonsense: wouldn't it be better, at least in a first phase, to over-provide, rather than under-provide? right now all the cockpit packages have...

Alright, marking as draft for now.

> we've had dynamic `Provides:` generation for well over a year, since commit [8817969](https://github.com/cockpit-project/starter-kit/commit/8817969d16badf06cb13b9a4560698444f9125ea). (Similar in other projects). Is there still something you'd like to change here? No, that seems...

Hi @grendelson, thanks for letting us know about OLM; I was definitely not aware of this, and it is good that the deprecation of the `rhn_register` and `rhn_channel` modules triggered...

@bkaraoren I think you misunderstand what this PR does: the shell `run` block used to invoke `wget` already has the `working_directory` parameter set, so using it _again_ in the output...

This must not be merged before https://github.com/candlepin/subscription-manager-cockpit/pull/68 is merged, otherwise the cockpit tests will fail (like they currently do).

Obsoleted by #3444, which was based on this.

> I triggered the tests and they run into trouble 😢 Ah, ouch, another victim of Python 3.12... Hopefully https://github.com/candlepin/subscription-manager-cockpit/pull/75 should fix it, at least it worked fine when testing...

> Hopefully [candlepin/subscription-manager-cockpit#75](https://github.com/candlepin/subscription-manager-cockpit/pull/75) should fix it, at least it worked fine when testing locally. This was merged, so this PR should be unblocked and working :)

This should not be a problem anymore: branches of subscription-manager that ship cockpit and are still tested with the cockpit CI were fixed (backporting commits from subscription-manager-cockpit).