Johan Euphrosine

@mithro were the concern you had back in https://github.com/google/skywater-pdk/pull/143#issuecomment-721942430 addressed by follow up commits: https://github.com/google/skywater-pdk/pull/143/commits/b211454ddb4b0d6f8b145da94924c2dafa30d35e https://github.com/google/skywater-pdk/pull/143/commits/8e9a17a8659352ce5fdee81a89d704a8fc8cb76e ?

@kgugala do you know if readthedocs got updated as part of your rebase, or does that needs to be done separatly (if the later, can you share the instructions?)

I was able to find the RTD logs https://readthedocs.org/api/v2/build/16966503.txt thanks to the instructions @umarcor provided. @kgugala @PiotrZierhoffer there doesn't seems to be any call to the `cell_list` directive that gets...

Looks like some work was done around this in #266 too.

and #256 too.

@farin64 can you confirm how/where you installed the PDK and how you're referrencing it from LTSpice? @mithro should we have a label for `tools-AnalogDevices-LTspice`?

maybe you could split the change from #366 so that it can be merged independently (it doesn't seems to be affecting the same files).

> This corrects the main errors in the documentation. From what I have in the magic tech file, though, it appears that the entry for Nwell should be changed from...

> Also, the file should probably have some indication that the values are for the nominal process corner, as opposed to the low and high resistance corners. Ideally, all three...

maybe reverting the hunks of the patch that deal with `print` and opening an issue to track the logging improvement separately would be a good way to get this merged?...