Paul R. C. Kent
Paul R. C. Kent
@markdewing is there an "important" level of progress you would like to get to by 3.7.0 or should I move this to 3.8.0?
We have a couple of weeks before the actual release - I have updated the milestone to be less aspirational and more realistic. Removing OOMP would be great. Please can...
Note - the initial link posted was incorrect; if you missed the office hours as a result, put a note here and we will setup an extra session.
Quick follow-up: Interestingly, switching non-local moves from v3 (used in all the reported crashes) to 'no' made the crash go away. 'v0' restores the crash => there is an issue...
If this is not known to work in legacy and/or is not immediately needed, having the energy density work only for locality approximation could be listed as a "known limitation",...
I suggest a regular CPU build.
Ouch. We will need to implement recompute for MSD as well then. Some of the highest accuracy runs being done are MSD.
Good point. Maybe. With a long enough run you have a greater chance to be unlucky.
I have been burned in full production runs in other codes. We will recompute for now. Experts can change the default. Improved algorithms can come later.
Interestingly ntest_nexus_structure fails. We need to do something about the error verbosity: ``` 734/1011 Test #1860: ntest_nexus_structure .............................................................................***Failed 0.88 sec Test name : structure Test sublabel : test_min_image_distances Test exception:...