Gregory Brown

Hi, can you submit a pull request, and then give an example that shows it works as expected? Happy to consider a patch if you send one in. Sorry for...

Thanks, this looks helpful! There are some Rubocop failures, which I can clean up when I get around to merging this, but if you'd like to sort those out you're...

1. No. 2. Please do. 3. Use the same wording we do in Prawn.

And also, it's not even remotely correct that Ruby has "switched to MIT" license. It switched from a dual license between matz's terms and GPLv2 to a dual license between...

@cheba No, they didn't! They switched to 2 clause BSD license

Let's please not waste time on another licensing issue for hypothetical reasons. I don't want to track down consent from whoever has contributed to TTFunk, and I want to keep...

The modification we made to Matz's terms was to change "GPLv2" to "GPLv2 or GPLv3". This is necessary for GPLv3 compatibility.

The actual words Matz wrote is called "The Ruby License": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruby_License This is correctly identified as RUBY and is what we use, verbatim. Our triple licensing scheme RUBY, GPLv2, GPLv3...

OK, do whatever you want with this @cheba.

TTFunk is both poorly documented and poorly tested, because we still pretty much treat it as an internal dependency of Prawn. If you're using TTFunk indirectly through Prawn, and you...