Charles Davison

Would it make sense to pass in a `data` object instead of the field? If based on a model it would be the output from model.toJSON().

If `schema` is also passed in then custom attributes on schema can be used too, just need to look out for conflicting variable names

@exussum12 Hi, I can't find a contact email for you, wanted to ask if you were interested in becoming a project admin as I don't have time to maintain this...

@exussum12 yep On 20 Jan 2016 19:19, "Scott Dutton" [email protected] wrote: > [image: screenshot_2016-01-20_19-18-13] > https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/1102850/12460214/9bf664a8-bfaa-11e5-87f8-6aa63c55805e.png > > Thats how I see it. @powmedia https://github.com/powmedia possibly, Ill > email you...

I like the idea; I wonder if `with` is the right word though. Something more self-documenting/more obvious might work better. Maybe `field` or `fieldType` if that doesn't conflict with anything...

Hi @there4, thanks for the PR. I've tried merging this but am getting a few failing tests; not sure if this is because of other code changes since this was...

A field is basically just a wrapper around the label and editor. The editor is where most of the action happens. In terms of automatically binding to model changes, this...

You mentioned you were having trouble triggering the blur event; is that fixed? I'm unable to test at the moment so if anyone can verify this PR please let me...

Also can you post your full schema?

Ah OK, haven't used backbone-bootstrap so could be that you'll need to adapt the templates. Does backbone-bootstrap definitely use Bootstrap 3 or is it still on Bootstrap 2? On Tue,...