Jarek Potiuk
Jarek Potiuk
Make perfect sense to be follow up. Thanks for explanation @notatallshaw - yeah the exclusive vs. inclusive is something not obvious from the first glance.
Very nice - and very neeeded :)
Actually it can. https://www.apache.org/legal/generative-tooling.html: > Given the above, code generated in whole or in part using AI can be contributed if the contributor ensures that: > > 1. The terms...
> According to [Devin's terms](https://www.cognition.ai/pages/terms-of-service), all outputs are fully owned by the user. No copyright and no third party materials. This is wrong. For example If they are using GPL...
BTW. If Devin wants to check if they follow the licence, they can write a question and explain what they do and ask for clarification via mechanisms described at https://www.apache.org/legal/#communications
I think the best is to lock the referred AssetModel row `for update`. This has far less of a performance impact - it only prevents several entities to modify this...
As commented in #59183 I do no think it will work. The locks are only created when row is selected, so when there is no row found, no lock is...
> [@potiuk](https://github.com/potiuk) another option is to make another dedicated lock table like an "apdr_mutex" table which would control only the creation of new APDR records. this would have the same...
Thank you everyone. Providers are released. I invite everyone to help improve providers for the next release, a list of open issues can be found [here](https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3Aarea%3Aproviders).