Jarek Potiuk
Jarek Potiuk
Sure :). Go ahead and ask questions. Ideally - in #airflow-how-to-pr channel in our slack so that it does not rely on me being present. There are plenty of contributors...
You can take it over if you care for it and lead it to completion if you do not hear back.
I think we need to wait for next dev call where we discuss "standard" provider's scope
> @potiuk / @eladkal are we good to merge this PR? No - not really - there is another change in progress - https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/42081 that moves Python operators to "standard"...
I was originally promoting the idea of attempting to use `otel` metrics to provide backwards compatibility with StatsD (as an option). I think at the last call @ferruzzi mentioned that...
It's all explained there - including (as of recently) links to examples where others attempted to propose their providers: https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/PROVIDERS.rst#accepting-new-community-providers Note - taht It's rather unll
@xBis7 -> maybe you could take a look at that ? I think that might be nice continuation of your improvements on OTEL ?
Yeah. thought so.
> Rats, looks like the joke is on me and this PR is blocked on another third-party...`ibmcloudant` has a dependency conflict with the Snowflake Python library that nerfs the Airflow...