Jarek Potiuk
Jarek Potiuk
That looks good - but possibly separating the pydantic removals out is a good idea + there are some test failures - which do not seem related to pydantic removal...
And yes - since pydantic is quite popular and has potential for conflicts- adding a one-line note/newsfragment is likely a good idea.
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41857 merged - merging this one then
(feel freee to merge it @pierrejeambrun if ready)
Ineed huge change but easy to review as most of it is the same. Currently Conflicts need to be resolved but I already reviewed it and it's good to go...
No. It basically needs someone who knows go and tooling and make a PR to fix the builds . Maybe you would like to take that on @DrFaust92 ? Once...
Seems that this one might be fixed by https://github.com/fsspec/universal_pathlib/issues/257
> Ping me once you fix the `Optional[str]` issue on your side. I can then release a new intermediate version of `universal-pathlib` with the #257 fix. I don't think it...
Marked is a good-first-issue. Maybe someone would like to take it on. But if you feel like that @brettplarson the surest way to get it implemented is for you to...