Pablo Mazzini

Hi @bakip, we do not have a connection check mechanism. It is up to the user to keep the list of servers up to date. With regards to dhcplb not...

I really don't like making the `Update` method removing an option, from its name it is not clear it will do this. I also don't like setting the value of...

> How about the approach to clearing options, specifically 7cd86e1? It is now a bit tangentially related, but could still be useful (since dhcpv6 has it). I am ok with...

I took a quick look and in general it looks good to me. I'll take a deeper look with more time later on and wait for other comments in the...

I'll leave time for other people to leave comments. If there are no comments, I'll merge it on Monday.

@twelho Sorry for dropping this for a while. Is this ready to be merged?

I think BSD was fixed but now we switched to Github CI. Do you want to update this PR?

Can you sign the commit?

Thanks for raising the issue. > the whole DHCP message is just silently ignored If the packet is not RFC compliant we will return/log an error. It is not silently...

Oh sorry, I misread it :s. Ok that is the old client. Yes makes sense to fill an issue for it. At least the new one doesn't silently ignore them.