Marc Pichler

re-opening as I think we need to create a follow-up bug issue.

@trentm I re-requested review as iitm was updated to latest, "changes requested"-reason probably does not apply anymore. :slightly_smiling_face:

> Hey! I can help with this. May I be assigned? Great! It's yours, thanks for picking this up :slightly_smiling_face:

Hi @djMax, I've tried to minimally reproduce this, but was unsuccessful: https://github.com/pichlermarc/repro-4324 As @dyladan said earlier, it's odd that a depdendency upgrade would surface this. In previous versions we have...

> is there any fix? What I found was to mock opentelemetry in all the test cases. But that is not the feasible solution. @charandazn #4432 *should* include a fix...

@dyladan I undid some of the notes you put into the issue title for `contribfest`. I have been thinking about how to best go about this in SDK 2.0 from...

I'm working on this; I'm starting with otlp/http protobuf exporters first.

This is in progress #4151 does change the gRPC exporters, a draft for http is available in #4415.

This is work in progress. Here's a list of things that need to be done: - [x] refactor gRPC exporters (PR https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-js/pull/4432) - [ ] refactor HTTP browser exporters (draft...

@haines we'll likely remove this type-parameter completely as we've had multiple probems with this in the past. See https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-js/pull/4598 for a full write-up.