Pierre Goiffon

Accepted during functional review for 3.1

Rebased branch + PR on develop

PR ready to review again

> Why didn't you include the existing and known error as a bug fix in the new 3.0.3 version? Hello, This was the product team decision. As said widely in...

Rebased & force pushed

Hello Thomas, Thanks for the contribution ! I see the method you modified will be called for datasource table creation in \SynchroDataSource::AfterInsert But when the table already exists, seems like...

Hello, Sorry with the work on the 3.1 release I had very little time. Will try to get back to this PR during upcoming weeks.

Hello, Sorry no possibility for me to handle this PR. Setting it back in the backlog.

Seems like you did a CK Editor update, which version and why ?

Hello @Molkobain :) There is a "rejected" label that would better fit with the decision made than the "invalid" label you did set ?