Brandon Philips

Actually, moved to v1.0.0 as I don't think anyone has really stepped up to own/help here on OCI signing.

I meant to move this to post-v1.0.0 as no one has stepped up and as it is an optional layer of the spec. Please discuss if anyone objects to this...

I am personally +1 for an annotation like: ``` { "ociVersion": "0.2.0", ... "annotations": { "opencontainers.org/image-spec/exposedPorts": "8080,53/udp" } } ``` I think in general we should avoid forcing someone to...

What do you mean by "golden master output"? @erikh is suggesting parsing json and checking fields while you seem to be thinking about something differently.

I agree, I don't think this is a good feature. And even if it might be we need more people asking for it.

I am moving this to post v1.0

I think this is something we should think about for post v1.0.0. I whole heartedly agree but in the ideal case the initial v1 serialization spec is binary compatible with...

@timthelion Yes, that would be the right way of approaching it. It would be a schema bump which would be a version break. Happy to consider adding this feature to...

@wking This isn't about blob delegation. This is about delegation of naming for images. Which is explicitly in scope (see the README).

@stevvooe I don't see how notary relates to name delegation. Do you have a doc?