pgaudet
pgaudet
I dont understand why we should have to assert that
The problem is that [farnesyl diphosphate biosynthetic process, mevalonate pathway](http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/GO_0010142) has logical definiton: 'biosynthetic process' and ('has intermediate' some '(R)-mevalonate') and ('has primary output' some 'farnesyl diphosphate') while [isoprenoid biosynthetic...
@ValWood Changing the logical definition ,we get the correct inferences: For metabolic processes, we should NOT have to assert any superclasses with respect to chemical entities, they should all be...
Ha ! Thanks for the clarification. We do have GO:1903428 positive regulation of reactive oxygen species biosynthetic process ; it sounds like you would like to distinguish nitrogen species. I...
Just to be clear: RHEA:67620 was made obsolete. is also obsolete (https://github.com/geneontology/go-annotation/issues/5179#issuecomment-2061082736) What about RHEA: 67624? It seems like if there is no TMG cap in mRNA, this should also...
Here https://wiki.geneontology.org/Guidelines_for_database_cross_references#Adding_database_cross-reference_types :)
@ValWood You can have the RHEA mappings as cross references, but not as definition xreferences.
yes yes it's just how the checks are set up for new RHEAs (is this right, @balhoff ?)
Looks good, sorry about being so slow to respond. This branch needs work - one obvious merge is here: https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/28466