pgaudet
pgaudet
Obsolete EC xrefs that need fixing (see https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/pull/27017): - [x] ERROR: has a definition xref to an obsolete EC: "EC:2.7.8.n3" (fixed in #27352) - [x] ERROR: has an xref to...
Hi @raymond91105 I made a SOP here to check these obsolete ECs: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YZeKpDjSecKu7P7IQsOzcdnxRDWSUYqoyyCBhvHvU3g/edit Let me know if you have any questions.
Hi @raymond91125 Sometimes the problem has already been noticed, so there may be an existing ticket. So we should take the opportunity to close these related tickets. Feel free to...
Hi @raymond91125 If an EC is obsolete, we remove if from GO. If an EC is out of scope for GO and we obsolete the GO term, we keep the...
@raymond91125 I see that GO:0050027 has a RHEA mapping, which according to the EC mapping in RHEA, should be moved to [L-idonate 5-dehydrogenase activity](http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/GO_0050572) For GO:0050229, please remove all cross...
> should then we delete all mentions of EC:1.1.1.128? Yes, I would. In fact I have also removed obsolete xrefs from definition xrefs and replaced them with GOC:curators, this way...
@raymond91125 Would you please add this to Monday's ontology call discussion?
@balhoff will change the check to - include synonym xrefs - ignore obsolete GO terms from the check.
List of non-obsolete GO terms is now here: https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/27410