pgaudet

@dustine32 Can you please check with SynGO if they can replace enzymatic activity assay evidence (ECO:0000005) by enzymatic activity assay evidence used in manual assertion (ECO:0005801) Thanks, Pascale

I agree this seems a bit dodgy. There is a RHEA reaction: [RHEA:16881](https://www.rhea-db.org/rhea/16881) @kaxelsen Do you know whether cyanide is physiological (and specific)?

One issue is that GO:0034508 is current named ''centromere complex assembly' - seems a bit meaningless? > A complex that assembles at the centomere This seems like a BP +...

> Also can't go under constitutive heterochromatin formation because CENP-A containing chromatin isn't heterochromatin. Noted, I wont do that.

What do you mean? centromeric chromatin formation is not a grouping term, it' a leaf: 

Hi @ValWood To recap: We were proposing to rename GO:0034508 centromere complex assembly to centromeric chromatin formation You mentioned above > I think you could remove it as a grouping...

Discussion with @ValWood and @colinlog - [x] obsolete GO:0034508 centromere complex assembly: unnecessary grouping term. Annotations could be moved to GO:0034080 CENP-A containing chromatin assembly or [GO:0051382 kinetochore assembly](https://amigo.geneontology.org/amigo/term/GO:0051382#display-lineage-tab) see...

Hi Val, Thanks for looking into this. I had looked before but I know it was not complete. > 1.i remove parent GO:0015891 siderophore transport Do you mean you want...

Yes - that was another complication with these terms.

> would be ferric-hydroxamate importer (or transporter?) This is a broader transport question. Right now we mostly dont have directionality in the MF branch. This needs to be applied consistently,...