pgaudet

Hi Tanya, What term do you need? negative regulation of starch biosynthetic process ? catabolic process? Would you please open a ticket in the [ontology tracker](https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues)? Thanks, Pascale

Hi @Antonialock Is this a receptor or an adaptor? Could this activity be a child of [cargo receptor activity](http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/GO_0038024)? Thanks, Pascale

@marcfeuermann I notice that we we don't have a term for 'autophagy receptor'; is this missing in the ontology ? If not, how is this supposed to be captured?

@raymond91125 Thanks for the observations. Do you have a proposal to make, or questions for @hattrill ? I am not clear how you want to proceed, or what you need....

Proposal from ontology call @raymond91125 @edwong57 @sjm41 : keep homoserine biosynthetic process because it is a branch point See also discussion here: https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/22542#issuecomment-1168893682 We need to make a (final) decision...

What's the start and end of each pathway? If methionine and threonine biosynthesis start with homoserine, then, you shouldn't annotate hom6 to these. How do we want the methionine and...

Let's confirm this on next Monday's ontology call.

@cmungall on ontology call: > I think the issue is we don’t define the start point of threonine biosynthesis

TO DO: Define starts and ends: for example 'L-threonine biosynthetic process' has primary input L-homoserine has primary output L-threonine Maybe later: make superpathways?

Hi @raymond91125 I would suggest that we are a lot more precise about the fact that this represents *a* pathway and not any pathway: biosynthetic process is defined as >...