Peter Todd

On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 12:25:20AM -0800, Léo Haf wrote: > Congratulations, what some feared finally [happened](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1724943620888006802?s=20) without us doing anything. > > @Glozow luke added the tests weeks...

On November 17, 2023 4:52:53 AM EST, Markus ***@***.***> wrote: >> The tweet you link shows how pointless this pull-req is. > >I want to be in charge of my...

I would NACK that as you are creating infrastructure for things like OFAC censorship. On December 6, 2023 1:21:15 PM GMT+01:00, Sjors Provoost ***@***.***> wrote: >Just to set expectations, I...

I agree with @fanquake, so NACK the choice of domain name. Anyone who actually sees the domain name used and uses it for some purpose will very likely be able...

@darosior You keep on saying that RBF is not incentive compatible. Question: in my article, in the context of replace-by-fee for lightning commitment transactions, are you claiming that *those* replacements...

@darosior > The v3 relay regime isn't perfect, it's just 100x better for this application than the current one. This is not a reason not to do v3. Are you...

> > @darosior You keep on saying that RBF is not incentive compatible. > > Question: in my article, in the context of replace-by-fee for lightning commitment transactions, are you...

While I'm at it, Concept NACK, due to the problems outlined in https://petertodd.org/2023/v3-transactions-review and https://petertodd.org/2023/v3-txs-pinning-vulnerability

@darosior > > The largest lightning channels out there are about 5BTC. Even if you were willing to bump fees, all the way to spending the entire 5BTC towards fees,...

> > Now, as for the choosing a feerate in advance problem, I explained fully in my article, showing how it's quite easy to pre-sign every conceivable feerate because there...