Peter Todd

@dergoegge > I would expect anyone to audit their own choice of that hash as well Notice how in the assume-UTXO work, we've chosen to not even give users the...

On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 06:29:20AM -0800, Andrew Poelstra wrote: > Well, the thread is still active, but my opinion (and I believe that of Peter Todd) is that...

The fact that Core devs feel like they can close this with no explanation at all suggests that protocols should use the backup mechanism of polluting the UTXO set. The...

On February 26, 2023 4:17:28 PM GMT+01:00, Aymeric Vitte ***@***.***> wrote: >@petertodd If I understand correctly your comment, you mean that without this change (as I think too) people will...

On February 26, 2023 7:01:05 PM GMT+01:00, Aymeric Vitte ***@***.***> wrote: >You can invent whatever non standard solution you like as long as the tx is valid and then work...

So the next step here for people who want to actually see this implemented is code, and perhaps more importantly, tests. The code change is fairly simple: change the `datacarrierlimit`...

On November 4, 2022 6:04:03 PM GMT+01:00, Andrew Chow ***@***.***> wrote: >In our wallet, we try not to make transactions that are unlikely to be propagated around the network. One...

On November 4, 2022 8:12:30 PM GMT+01:00, Andrew Chow ***@***.***> wrote: >> This isn't a matter of "respect": BIP 125 isn't a contract. We have a transaction that we would...

> I don't think it makes sense to show this option unless the mempool takes and broadcasts the transaction, that is `-mempoolfullrbf` is on. So, how about I add a...

> Allow bumpfee in GUI and the first time a user tries to do it change the mempool policy fullrbf to 1 as that's the implicit intention of the user....