Markus Sabadello
Markus Sabadello
Hmm has anyone ever done this for something that is specified/maintained by a W3C WG? When would you create a DIIP vs. raising an issue on a spec repo?
I remember this discussion and agree with the rationale. In addition to the work you mention, discovering services by type also has been supported by certain other (historical) identifier resolution...
I agree this should be added as a `serviceType` parameter to the spec. It should be added in these places: - https://w3c.github.io/did-resolution/#did-parameters - Add the parameter here - https://w3c.github.io/did-resolution/#dereferencing-algorithm -...
Marking as pending-close, since I think this has been addressed by https://github.com/w3c/did-resolution/pull/125
It's true that privileged positions exist not only on the VC layer, but also in many DID methods. E.g. to create a DID in Sovrin, you need a signature from...
I agree with the previous comment that it would be helpful to split this up into multiple PRs. There are several different topics that seem unrelated, e.g. smart contracts, vendor...
+1 to adding additional guidance on compatibility between the JSON and JSON-LD (and other) representations. The WG has spent a lot of time on this topic, without really coming to...
There is a verification method type which can do this: https://github.com/w3c-ccg/verifiable-conditions
Looks good, thanks for investing time in improving this.
@nalamillo would you be interested in adding a section to this "Implementation Guide" document, based on your experience with the DID-eIDAS bridge?