Markus Sabadello
Markus Sabadello
Coming back to this after a while, I wonder how much of it is still relevant. I believe some of what has been discussed in this issue is covered by...
Per discussion on today's DID WG call, marking this as pending-close.
I agree with @danpape 's comment. The problem here is not the headings, it's that maybe the meanings of "primary resources" and "secondary resource" aren't clear enough. I was trying...
During today's DID WG meeting we discussed that we should try to avoid the terms "primary resource" and "secondary resource" altogether. @jandrieu and @peacekeeper will look at this and propose...
Marking this PR as pending-close, and I created a separate issue where we can discuss this further before attempting another PR: https://github.com/w3c/did-resolution/issues/94
I think this makes a lot of sense, since there are many use cases (e.g. when verifying a VC) where a client is only interested in keys that have a...
Marking as pending-close after merging https://github.com/w3c/did-resolution/pull/122.
I agree with this summary, and I agree it shouldn't matter which DID method is used when running a test suite for the DID Resolution spec.
What happens if the self-assessment says "this registration is fully conformant", but in fact it isn't? In any case, whether or not we introduce the self-assessment, I think editors still...
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/695438/safe-characters-for-friendly-url