Markus Sabadello
Markus Sabadello
> there was also zero progress on any DID method standardization It will take a little bit longer for DID methods to be standardized, but I wouldn't speak of "zero...
For the Universal Resolver reports, we always just use the string "Universal Resolver" as the "implementation" field (e.g. see [here](https://github.com/w3c/did-test-suite/blob/main/packages/did-core-test-server/suites/implementations/universal-resolver-did-lit.json#L2)). @BernhardFuchs maybe we should update our Universal Resolver reports to...
Nice and useful application of VC technology, Danube Tech supports this.
Coming back to this issue.. In the section on HTTP(S) Binding, it is possible to either retrieve just the DID document, or the full DID resolution result (DID document +...
@BernhardFuchs do you think it makes sense to standardize this, or can we close this issue here (but potentially still support such a feature in specific implementations)?
@BernhardFuchs Could you comment here if you still think this should be part of the DID Resolution spec? If not, we'll mark this as pending-close.
Related to https://github.com/w3c/did-resolution/issues/79
Related issue: https://github.com/w3c/did-resolution/issues/28
@mccown I think that is good feedback regarding logging, tracking, profiling of the clients. Could you maybe create a separate issue for that?
Marking as pending-close, since this has been discussed on a high level. For now, one concrete issue has been identified related to this topic: - https://github.com/w3c/did-resolution/issues/95