Phillip

Excellent bug report @affaniqbal, if duncan's suggestions don't work let me know and I'll have a look. Have a couple of vague ideas I am happy to try out.

Hi @ericpre, Thanks for this. I think one of the main problems we had with testing the .mib reader was getting small enough working file examples. Even something as simple...

> > Thanks for this. I think one of the main problems we had with testing the .mib reader was getting small enough working file examples. > > Indeed, and...

Hello, Thanks, this is a good clear issue. I think the root problem is with the io (so I'll raise it in hyperspy once I've confirmed that) - in the...

I think this is working as expected. The `.plot()` functionality plots a sum over the entire image plane, which isn't necessarily going to give you great contrast. Given TIA is...

This may well actually be related to hyperpsy code (in which case I will raise a separate issue) in the meantime either of the reshape commands described above should work...

Hi, Thanks for raising this issue - you're right ragged is very annoying although I think upstream updates are coming soon that will help with this. In the meantime could...

given that nobody has taken this up, I think I'm going to mark it with the same designation this has been given previously; non-ragged peak arrays should be an extreme...

I would make it a setting of `load_mib`, then try and be as detailed as possible about which instrument it works for in the docs, as this seems to be...

On a related note, I'm going to drop the content of #612 into this thread. "Currently we have no method for comparing a simulated list of vectors and an experimental...